[draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-18] Mention BYE not just CANCEL

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

Hi, draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-18 in page 6 states:

In addition, there is a possibility for UAC to receive a 488 response
for an PRACK request. In that case, UAC may send again a PRACK
request without an offer or send a CANCEL request to terminate the
INVITE transaction.

It should also mention the posibility of sending a BYE which, as per
RFC 3261, is also valid to terminate an early-dialog.

Regards.

[Paul Kyzivat]

Post by Iñaki Baz Castillo
In addition, there is a possibility for UAC to receive a 488 response
for an PRACK request. In that case, UAC may send again a PRACK
request without an offer or send a CANCEL request to terminate the
INVITE transaction.
It should also mention the posibility of sending a BYE which, as per
RFC 3261, is also valid to terminate an early-dialog.

Too late. Its already in the RFC editor's queue.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-***@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use ***@ietf.or